From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,470860aa3e635a7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!news.unit0.net!feeder06.uucp-net.de!news.uucp.at!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: GNAT for MS Visual Studio
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <wvbrabr9hq0t.fsf@astra06.norway.sun.com>
 <ePWdnf5PGZFiwmfbnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@comcast.com>
 <ltfy11y10v.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <TJSdncwgUrlA-2HbnZ2dnUVZ_ramnZ2d@comcast.com>
 <4xsl4zw3bp.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <YcCdnaCp_dEWKmLbnZ2dnUVZ_qqgnZ2d@comcast.com> <fdsf0r$q0t$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <1191357491.860178.230380@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
 <4702ADCC.7080209@obry.net>
 <1191439439.120567.172630@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <4703F02D.3030207@obry.net>
 <1191682021.844225.236870@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <4707A3D0.3070702@obry.net> <1tq0h0fb74sxe$.2ys0qzmfxcqo.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4707C0CC.1000108@obry.net> <1aa677sd3f3ox.k8awuo7pj13r.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1191702767.598768.210960@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <1aqbpv0czr253.wrmcd70o5se5$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1191792620.535744.132500@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
 <liz4nefx8mhu$.qpy964l7mn99$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1191839564.304635.30030@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:10:27 +0200
Message-ID: <46md5qdz3w51.uev498rne1un.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Oct 2007 17:04:29 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 3c0368e7.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=J68mZ@;\J>MA<A_d>@P]\DMcF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRA^;5]aA^R6>BJ_VceGo4=II[6LHn;2LCVN7enW;^6ZC`DIXm65S@:3>OLVO2h10a5RI
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2353
Date: 2007-10-08T17:04:29+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:32:44 -0700, Maciej Sobczak wrote:

> On 8 Pa , 09:50, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
> wrote:
> 
>> It is called "higher level language," which translates to "you cannot have
>> ideas even if you just do 'a read'". I.e. there is no difference.
> 
> There is - others already explained that containers do some
> bookkeeping even when they are "just" read. This bookkeeping is hidden
> from you.

There is no difference, because in a higher level language reading might do
bookkeeping as well. 

The contract is silent about what happens when you are not allowed to
access the object. Anything can.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de