From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,546c9d71cfb0c1ee
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-19 01:28:43 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
From: rolf.ebert_nospam_@gmx.net (Rolf Ebert)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: [Announcement] New Project: ASIS for GNAT
Date: 19 Mar 2004 01:28:43 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <46b8b50a.0403190128.7779d8ee@posting.google.com>
References: <1252369.os30E2mMWi@linux1.krischik.com>
 <87ish8iit1.fsf@insalien.org> <4441304.6rRzW27CSL@linux1.krischik.com>
 <877jxns0e2.fsf@insalien.org> <1413383.96bL1pG4j9@linux1.krischik.com>
 <871xnvrqvl.fsf@insalien.org> <1420314.lQdMtk62IO@linux1.krischik.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403161456120.14559-100000@aix.act-europe.fr>
 <87ekrsdg0r.fsf@insalien.org> <1728933.b9v3IVdcgI@linux1.krischik.com>
 <46b8b50a.0403180008.2e0f0ce1@posting.google.com>
 <c3bvd3$kcj$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.97.67.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1079688523 7408 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2004 09:28:43
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:28:43 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6436
Date: 2004-03-19T01:28:43-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> wrote in message news:<c3bvd3$kcj$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>...
> Rolf Ebert <rolf.ebert_nospam_@gmx.net> wrote:
> : I regularily build gcc from the 3.3 and 3.4 branches on Linux and
> : Windows (about once per week) and don't have major problems.  (see my
> : other posting about ACATS results).
> 
> Interesting. Do you have any experience of whether or not --enable-checking
> turns out to be relevant?
> 

No, I have no experience with --enable-checking. I had to look up the
doc:

<< 
--enable-checking 
--enable-checking=list 
When you specify this option, the compiler is built to perform
checking of tree node types when referencing fields of that node, and
some other internal consistency checks. This does not change the
generated code, but adds error checking within the compiler. This will
slow down the compiler and may only work properly if you are building
the compiler with GCC. This is on by default when building from CVS or
snapshots, but off for releases. [...]
>>

I build gcc from CVS sources, therefor the tested gcc always had
checking enabled.  I don't see how that has any influence on the ACATS
results, though, as it does not change the generated code.