From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,546c9d71cfb0c1ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-14 07:46:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: rolf.ebert_nospam_@gmx.net (Rolf Ebert) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [Announcement] New Project: ASIS for GNAT Date: 14 Mar 2004 07:46:00 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <46b8b50a.0403140746.95e9c51@posting.google.com> References: <1252369.os30E2mMWi@linux1.krischik.com> <3zl4c.17228$mM.123491@attbi_s02> NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.128.19.38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1079279161 23194 127.0.0.1 (14 Mar 2004 15:46:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6318 Date: 2004-03-14T07:46:00-08:00 List-Id: "Jeff C," wrote in message news:<3zl4c.17228$mM.123491@attbi_s02>... > Anyone run the test suite recently on any popular targets and want to report > results? I ran gcc 3.3.3 and 3.4 prereleases on the ACATS test suite at several optimization levels on Linux and Windows during the last few weeks. As I cannot attach a pdf or Excel file here, I am willing to send the summary sheet to anybody who is interested. In short: the 3.4 prereleases are considerably better than the 3.3.3 release. The number of failures dropped from 24 to 7 (Linux) or 5 (Windows) out of more than 2300 test files. The remaining 7 errors on Linux are all related to the complex calculation library and don't show up on Windows. The number of failures is stable at -O0 to -O2. Only further optimizations and inlining (-O3, -gnatN, -funroll-all-loop, -finline-functions) trigger additional failures. Rolf