From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,632dbd0caea19836
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 23:10:30 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus.rm.tsoh@maps.futureapps.de>
Organization: #
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: System calls - GNAT library vs. direct bindings
References: <1180623520.303981.191090@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <m2ira8lpt5.fsf@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2ira8lpt5.fsf@mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <465f3924$0$6411$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 May 2007 23:07:48 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9b4dc904.newsspool2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=QC]a]MnA:e;nBOkdL^Lo7>A9EHlD;3Yc24Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;UP?h3?choU;PCY\c7>ejV8oIoi]AGNeK83Z[b9T52Z;7
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16004
Date: 2007-05-31T23:07:48+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Wright wrote:

> given that GNAT already has a
> library. It would have been yet another library to justify to the
> technical authority.

Are standards and portability still an issue in Ada projects?

Aonix seems to offer a standards conforming POSIX binding.
Can't say how much networking it offers.