From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9979e647d5c5aa6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.ip-plus.net!newsfeed.ip-plus.net!news.post.ch!not-for-mail From: Martin Krischik Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: When will 2007 standard be available in gcc-ada? Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:55:17 +0200 Organization: Swisscom IP+ (post doesn't reflect views of Swisscom) Message-ID: <4652da25$1@news.post.ch> References: <2128058.uC2TSY58Nb@linux1.krischik.com> <1179827279.4898.7.camel@kartoffel> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.41.146.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: atlas.ip-plus.net 1179834923 29839 194.41.146.1 (22 May 2007 11:55:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ip-plus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:55:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) In-Reply-To: <1179827279.4898.7.camel@kartoffel> X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: w01iwt.pnet.ch X-Original-Trace: 22 May 2007 13:55:17 +0200, w01iwt.pnet.ch Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15876 Date: 2007-05-22T13:55:17+02:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus schrieb: > On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:04 +0200, Martin Krischik wrote: >> Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote: >> >>> does anyone know when the 2007 standard will be fully supported (and >>> working properly) in gcc-ada? does anyone publish a timetable? >> Be fair: Not even C 99 is "working properly" in the gcc nor is there a >> timetable when it will - so why should there be one for Ada - it's a free >> as in "free beer" compiler after all. > No, GCC isn't a free beer compiler. The compiler is GPLed! Shure it is: Unlike GNAT/Pro I can download the GCC for free from http://gcc.gnu.org. And GPL for an executable is no restriction. There is no *relevant* difference between GPL vs. LGPL vs. MGPL for an exe - only for dll's and lib's it make a *relevant* difference. > The libraries carry a license exception permitting use > of unchanged library items in both open and closed source > programs at no cost. Right! Martin -- Martin Krischik