From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: community-based compiler (was Re: What exactly is the licensing
 situation with GNAT?)
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 01:07:07 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <464563264437706207.500344laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
References: <d4b8f45d-e327-4d78-a0d6-838aba063e4d@googlegroups.com>
 <lyoascltws.fsf@pushface.org> <YYE8w.620042$Lj7.284655@fx22.iad>
 <87389olqie.fsf@ixod.org> <zTF8w.509165$No4.167804@fx19.iad>
 <3516753b-5304-408d-99c8-67f544fdc185@googlegroups.com>
 <d6f2eb01-e065-4804-8853-98b9ef6f575b@googlegroups.com>
 <20141114085046.4cb00404@atmarama.ddns.net>
 <nLq9w.723848$Fo3.267307@fx09.iad>
 <8392b6bd-61ab-43f9-aa6d-92a4b3f17f0d@googlegroups.com>
 <gZt9w.655521$1s.624950@fx05.iad>
 <835808234437691990.804817laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <ctv9w.522214$Ub6.233903@fx20.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: aBdcEyjNLk0foPeg8eiaog.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: NewsTap/4.0.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23346
Date: 2014-11-15T01:07:07+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14-Nov-14 14:07, Luke A. Guest wrote:
>> Jesus! That would be hell. A compiler without dynamic memory? Really? No
>> thanks.
> 
> Ah, right; I'd forgotten about that restriction -- I was thinking more
> along the lines of the prover-/verifier-tools -- though aren't there
> large chunks where you don't need dynamic memory?

Not really no. An entire compiler pretty much uses the heap exclusively,
you'd be hard pressed to build a compiler using ore allocated memory or
just static amounts in general.