From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df1a7f1c3c3bc77e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!news-zh.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.ip-plus.net!newsfeed.ip-plus.net!news.post.ch!not-for-mail
From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: An Ada Advice Inquiry
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 09:07:46 +0200
Organization: Swisscom IP+ (post doesn't reflect views of Swisscom)
Message-ID: <463ed042$1@news.post.ch>
References: <wtw_h.237$UU.102@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net>
   <uabwku1tj.fsf@stephe-leake.org>   <BlI_h.98$SC4.46@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com>
   <u1whuzvhm.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
   <Nhd%h.4512$H_.965@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net>
   <1178448459.256329.28590@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <JUl%h.424$mR2.101@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>
 <1178480316.415370.194260@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.41.146.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: atlas.ip-plus.net 1178521673 11237 194.41.146.1 (7 May 2007 07:07:53
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ip-plus.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 07:07:53 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
In-Reply-To: <1178480316.415370.194260@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: w01iwt.pnet.ch
X-Original-Trace: 7 May 2007 09:07:46 +0200, w01iwt.pnet.ch
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15607
Date: 2007-05-07T09:07:46+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Maciej Sobczak schrieb:

> I think that this is exactly where you miss that last couple of years.
> I really don't remember when was the last time I cared about low-level
> concerns in C++. Unless I had to (that is, it was actually the goal),
> but then nothing was obstructing my goals neither.

I remember that last time very vividly - when the C++ compiler I was 
using thought that an int& and a unsigned& could be converted freely 
using a temporary on the stack.

Martin