From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93a8020cc980d113
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!exabot.com!freenix!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <4624EC4F.9060301@obry.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:48:31 +0200
From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>
Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
To: Ed Falis <falis@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Ada?
References: <1176150704.130880.248080@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
 <zyBSh.44138$oV.14776@attbi_s21> <461B52A6.20102@obry.net>
 <awirc4gv13.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <461BA892.3090002@obry.net>
 <yeabxgnsrj.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <82dgve.spf.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <1176226291.589741.257600@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <4eaive.6p9.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <sa4ps6apjb7.fsf@margay.local>
 <1176396382.586729.195490@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
 <n3r6qpea4p.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <f00106$tqm$1@f04n12.cac.psu.edu>
 <c98xcs8jao.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <46249099.4080408@obry.net>
 <PM00042E503F06FEA3@tilopa.unknown.dom>
In-Reply-To: <PM00042E503F06FEA3@tilopa.unknown.dom>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Apr 2007 17:48:37 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.124.253.104
X-Trace: 1176824917 news.orange.fr 25915 82.124.253.104:4398
X-Complaints-To: abuse@orange.fr
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15090
Date: 2007-04-17T17:48:37+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ed, Georg,

Thanks for your answers. But I was more thinking about being two people
on a project not necessary two behind the screen at the same time. Code
review can be done at any time with the right setup (sending mails for
each check-in for example) it is possible to make code review as
something "normal". Many developers seems to not like somebody looking
at their code, if every piece of code is sent to a dev mailing-list it
changes things, making code more visible by default.

I do think that a single developer on a project is bad for the overall
quality... I'm just looking for so data to backup this idea :)

Well this has nothing to do with Ada, so I'm completely off topic, fell
free to ignore :)

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|              http://www.obry.net
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595