From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1a44c40a66c293f3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!164.128.36.58!news.ip-plus.net!newsfeed.ip-plus.net!news.post.ch!not-for-mail
From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: PAR (Was: Embedded languages based on early Ada)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:22:59 +0100
Organization: Swisscom IP+ (post doesn't reflect views of Swisscom)
Message-ID: <45ed16d4$1@news.post.ch>
References: <1172192349.419694.274670@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <uslcxt1u7.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <1172239820.896603.222120@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <u649rx29a.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <nhn5b4-9b2.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <pan.2007.02.24.22.11.44.430179@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <u7iu68eba.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <es4dl5$ve2$1@newsserver.cilea.it>
 <pan.2007.03.01.11.23.01.229462@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <113ls6wugt43q$.cwaeexcj166j$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <pan.2007.03.02.11.36.51.700020@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <1i3drcyut9aaw.isde6utlv6iq.dlg@40tude.net>
 <uvehjjdff.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
 <1c61jqeqo68w$.2irtg70stnsa.dlg@40tude.net>
 <uejo681zf.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net> <ygek5xvms48.fsf_-_@hugsarin.dmusyd.edu>
 <pan.2007.03.06.02.02.27.892793@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.41.146.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: atlas.ip-plus.net 1173165784 1148 194.41.146.1 (6 Mar 2007 07:23:04
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ip-plus.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 07:23:04 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.03.06.02.02.27.892793@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: w01iwt.pnet.ch
X-Original-Trace: 6 Mar 2007 08:23:00 +0200, w01iwt.pnet.ch
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9711
Date: 2007-03-06T08:22:59+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dr. Adrian Wrigley schrieb:

> PAR is about indicating in the source code which statement sequences
> are unordered.  The idea is to make the syntax for concurrency
> as simple as the syntax for sequentality. Perhaps using "par"
> instead of "begin" is the way to go.  Adding "all" to the for
> loop also makes a lot of sense.

Should it not be one or the other?

begin all
end;

for all ....
end loop;

*OR*

par
end par;

for par .... loop
end loop;



Martin