From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:25d4:: with SMTP id g203-v6mr14846873itg.37.1525453029571; Fri, 04 May 2018 09:57:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:70d1:: with SMTP id w17-v6mr1384788otj.5.1525453029412; Fri, 04 May 2018 09:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!v8-v6no1612667itc.0!news-out.google.com!15-v6ni1768itg.0!nntp.google.com!u74-v6no502049itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 09:57:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <25d61e8a-99e3-4eb1-81eb-e8485ae8de97@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=47.185.233.194; posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.233.194 References: <9c3a75d6-a01f-4cfa-9493-10b8b082ead8@googlegroups.com> <114db2c4-1e8c-4506-8d7c-df955dd9f808@googlegroups.com> <87d0yc1lsq.fsf@nightsong.com> <878t901jp4.fsf@nightsong.com> <38dddb6a-0e6f-4dcb-ade2-241528b61288@googlegroups.com> <25d61e8a-99e3-4eb1-81eb-e8485ae8de97@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <45cb0937-7da0-4b14-aa6c-19d1db133dde@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Precisely why can't official FSF GNAT maintainers copy bug fixes in GNAT & its GCC-contained runtime en masse from GNAT GPL Community Edition? From: "Dan'l Miller" Injection-Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 16:57:09 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51977 Date: 2018-05-04T09:57:09-07:00 List-Id: On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 11:20:30 AM UTC-5, Mark Lorenzen wrote: > You buy a support contract for a maximum number of developers based on th= e "honour system" > i.e. you don't cheat. I am pretty sure that RMS would not consider the software-freedom rights ov= ertly & meticulously granted under the wording of the GMGPL as =E2=80=9Cche= ating=E2=80=9D.