From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1a44c40a66c293f3
X-Google-Thread: 1089ad,7e78f469a06e6516
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1089ad,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.germany.com!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!proxad.net!193.252.118.146.MISMATCH!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <45E92E64.2090301@obry.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 09:14:28 +0100
From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>
Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.vhdl
To: Ray Blaak <rAYblaaK@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
Subject: Re: Embedded languages based on early Ada (from "Re: Preferred OS,
 processor family for running embedded Ada?")
References: <1172192349.419694.274670@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <uslcxt1u7.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <1172239820.896603.222120@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <u649rx29a.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <nhn5b4-9b2.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <pan.2007.02.24.22.11.44.430179@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <u7iu68eba.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <es4dl5$ve2$1@newsserver.cilea.it>
 <pan.2007.03.01.11.23.01.229462@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <113ls6wugt43q$.cwaeexcj166j$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <pan.2007.03.02.11.36.51.700020@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
 <1i3drcyut9aaw.isde6utlv6iq.dlg@40tude.net>
 <uvehjjdff.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
In-Reply-To: <uvehjjdff.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
NNTP-Posting-Date: 03 Mar 2007 09:14:43 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.120.29.64
X-Trace: 1172909683 news.orange.fr 5095 82.120.29.64:4864
X-Complaints-To: abuse@orange.fr
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9645 comp.lang.vhdl:7613
Date: 2007-03-03T09:14:43+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ray Blaak a �crit :
> I am somewhat rusty on my Ada tasking knowledge, but why can't Thing be a
> protected object?

I don't think this is true. Thing can be a protected object and passed
to some procedures. No problem here I would say and probably the right
approach.

> It seems to me that is precisely the kind of synchronization control mechanism
> you want to be able to have here.

Agreed.

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|              http://www.obry.net
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595