From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7767a311e01e1cd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:51:01 +0200
From: Damien Carbonne <damien.carbonne@free.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT compiler switches and optimization
References: <1161341264.471057.252750@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
 <9Qb_g.111857$aJ.65708@attbi_s21> <434o04-7g7.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <4539ce34$1_2@news.bluewin.ch> <nrup04-5hj.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <453A532F.2070709@obry.net> <9kfq04-sgm.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <sj3r04-rlv.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <5vgs04-64f.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <453bc74e$0$19614$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <453bcdb9_6@news.bluewin.ch>
In-Reply-To: <453bcdb9_6@news.bluewin.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <453bd9b5$0$31631$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Oct 2006 22:51:01 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.235.135.166
X-Trace: 1161550261 news-1.free.fr 31631 82.235.135.166:57432
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!news.n-ix.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.ecp.fr!feed.ac-versailles.fr!fdn.fr!glou.fr.eu.org!proxad.net!cleanfeed2-a.proxad.net!nnrp8-2.free.fr!not-for-mail
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7143
Date: 2006-10-22T22:51:01+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Gautier a �crit :
> Damien Carbonne:
<snip>
> 
> 
> The question of Fortran's array storage has been treated earlier in this 
> discussion, you just happened to add more noise by not reading enough 
> posts ;-). Look at the post of Martin Krischik, 20.10.06 18:30 CET... it 
> shows the most serious testing so far, with the exact sources used for 
> testing.
Sorry for this. I'll go back to my silent lazy listening after this 
message :-) S. Tardieu had also suggested this layout issue in one 
message and I didn't follow the links given by M. Krischik. Anyway, 
independently of compiler bugs or limitations, differences in matrix 
layout leads to different (non strictly equivalent) programs! Which was 
precisely a question asked by J. Creem in his first sentence !

Regards
Damien