From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,216b46007e6019b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-13 06:32:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Alternatives to Emacs under Linux? Date: 13 Nov 2002 06:32:05 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <4519e058.0211130632.6c5c2311@posting.google.com> References: <3dd13b5a$0$308$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.115.221.98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1037197925 15405 127.0.0.1 (13 Nov 2002 14:32:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Nov 2002 14:32:05 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30803 Date: 2002-11-13T14:32:05+00:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol wrote in message news:... > Huh? Emacs may be many things, but buggy? Not even a Vim user like me I have never done it with Linux, but I've found it quite buggy whenever I compile it from sources myself. :-( Prebuilt binaries tend to be solid though; certianly they are way more stable than VisualStudio. > Of course Vim is the best :-) http://vim.sf.net Yeah. You can't get a MS "Clippy" clone for Emacs, like you can for Vim :-) http://vigor.sourceforge.net/