From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93e454a2e1c4ab39
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-29 06:33:59 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GRACE and hashtable
Date: 29 Jul 2002 06:33:58 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <4519e058.0207290533.b1257d8@posting.google.com>
References: <MVw09.3317$sR2.57008@news4.ulv.nextra.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.115.221.98
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1027949639 11001 127.0.0.1 (29 Jul 2002 13:33:59
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jul 2002 13:33:59 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27446
Date: 2002-07-29T13:33:59+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Frank" <franjoe@frisurf.no> wrote in message news:<MVw09.3317$sR2.57008@news4.ulv.nextra.no>...

> Has hashtables(along the lines of the hashtables in Java) been implemented
> in GRACE yet?

No. To the best of my knowledge, it hasn't even been discussed.