From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,52fd60a337c05842 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-14 13:58:16 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada paper critic Date: 14 Jun 2002 13:58:15 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <4519e058.0206141258.3c1c8d2c@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.115.221.98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1024088296 8324 127.0.0.1 (14 Jun 2002 20:58:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jun 2002 20:58:16 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25982 Date: 2002-06-14T20:58:16+00:00 List-Id: "Alderson, Paul A." wrote in message news:... > If you look at just the language then I'd have to say Ada programs are less The funny thing about this particular troll is that, if you replace all occurances of "Ada" with "C", it is actually more accurate. :-)