From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,47bc849aad30d586 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-29 12:05:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A standard package for config files is needed Date: 29 May 2002 12:05:28 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <4519e058.0205291105.31656da1@posting.google.com> References: <39ee2480.0205282322.3bbd4673@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.109.83.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022699128 22620 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2002 19:05:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 May 2002 19:05:28 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24956 Date: 2002-05-29T19:05:28+00:00 List-Id: volkert.barr@freenet.de (Volkert) wrote in message news:<39ee2480.0205282322.3bbd4673@posting.google.com>... > The Ada Version should be a bit more powerfull. e.g store > triples of (Scope,Key,Value), may be in be form you described > above: Scope.Key=Value In this scheme, do you think "scope"s should be flat (1 level only), or should they be hierarchal (like Ada packages or the Microsoft registry)? -- T.E.D. Home - mailto:dennison@telepath.com (Yahoo: Ted_Dennison) Homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html