From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1dd28d5040ded1f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-21 10:24:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Announce: Grace project site operational Date: 21 May 2002 10:24:01 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <4519e058.0205210924.47123478@posting.google.com> References: <4519e058.0205150657.3b695758@posting.google.com> <4519e058.0205160543.34b32481@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.115.221.98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022001841 24357 127.0.0.1 (21 May 2002 17:24:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 May 2002 17:24:01 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24473 Date: 2002-05-21T17:24:01+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote in message news:... > Sounds like we need a "Grace committee" to vote on what goes in Grace. > That might be a good idea; the "GNAT committee" has done a fantastic > job :). Our philosophy so far has been consensus rather than voting. I understand that is the norm for successful collabarative software projects, so I'd like to stick to that rule.