From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ae1b1bf3750805f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-08 11:06:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reverse Engeenering Date: 8 Apr 2002 11:06:13 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <4519e058.0204081006.6cc320bd@posting.google.com> References: <3cae0835$0$27054$7a628cd7@news.club-internet.fr> <3CB1AF02.F9B83004@despammed.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.115.221.98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1018289173 7745 127.0.0.1 (8 Apr 2002 18:06:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Apr 2002 18:06:13 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22241 Date: 2002-04-08T18:06:13+00:00 List-Id: Wes Groleau wrote in message news:<3CB1AF02.F9B83004@despammed.com>... > Teamwork was so bad, it would be BETTER to start > from scratch, but that was more than eight years > ago. By now, they've probably either fixed it > or dropped it. Ahh yes, the saga of Teamwork. I understand it was originally developed at GE Aerospace (my first employer), and then sold to Cadre. Cadre later sold it to Cayenne, who renamed it "ObjectTeam". In the last 2 years, the following happened: Cayenne then sold it to Sterling, who already had a CASE tool called COOL:JEX. They apparently liked the name better than the product, as they dropped their COOL:JEX codebase and renamed ObjectTeam as COOL:JEX. Then Sterling got bought out by Computer Associates and briefly renamed it to COOL:Teamwork before selling it to Telelogic a couple of months later. Telelogic renamed it "Tau", then later "Tau UML Suite" I used Teamwork back in the pre-UML days (1989), but we never tried code generation or reverse engineers. I used the ObjectTeam (not realizing it was the same product), and can vouch that its reverse-engineering still sucked. For instance, it wanted to make each enumeration type ID a class instance. %-( I haven't used any of its later incarnations, so I can't vouch for them. -- T.E.D. Home - mailto:dennison@telepath.com (Yahoo: Ted_Dennison) Homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html