From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,53c5fea49e77990c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-01 06:57:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Dot Net ? Date: 1 Apr 2002 06:57:14 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <4519e058.0204010657.708d0cdc@posting.google.com> References: <3CA6C41F.E3A0A406@easystreet.com> <3CA7DB49.31633D7@easystreet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.115.221.98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1017673034 32077 127.0.0.1 (1 Apr 2002 14:57:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Apr 2002 14:57:14 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21940 Date: 2002-04-01T14:57:14+00:00 List-Id: Al Christians wrote in message news:<3CA7DB49.31633D7@easystreet.com>... > Preben Randhol wrote: > "Warnings > > The program(s) might crash unexpectedly or behave otherwise > strangely. ... The stability seems to depend a lot on the machine, > display drivers, other software installed, ... > I'll admit that GtkAda has made plenty of progress over recent years and > that some of the demos now look very nice. But these kinds of warnings > and possible mysterious incompatibilities make it not-usable for much > of my work. How is this substantially different from any other CYA warnings you see on software today (for example, the famous "not for use in safety-critical systems" warning that comes with Java)? -- T.E.D. Home - mailto:dennison@telepath.com (Yahoo: Ted_Dennison) Homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html