From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d75494dd10472a30 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-25 07:42:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Components - GRACE Lists Date: 25 Feb 2002 07:42:02 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <4519e058.0202250742.615e57c3@posting.google.com> References: <3C76EE71.40506@telepath.com> <3c77bfff.325065109@news.cis.dfn.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.115.221.98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1014651722 27239 127.0.0.1 (25 Feb 2002 15:42:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Feb 2002 15:42:02 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20375 Date: 2002-02-25T15:42:02+00:00 List-Id: nickroberts@ukf.net (Nick Roberts) wrote in message news:<3c77bfff.325065109@news.cis.dfn.de>... > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 01:26:29 GMT, Ted Dennison > strongly typed: > >and the fact that they trademarked "GRACE" and not "Grace", I think we > >may be OK using the name (at least tenatively during the beta stages), > >but I'm sure some will disagree. > > Might it be possible for you to contact the US trademarking authority to > see if you can get a confirmation that it was never trademarked, or that it > has officially lapsed, or maybe contact information? I suppose that could be looked into. If the company is truly defunct though, I don't think it matters much if the trademark has another year or so to go. > I have a suspicion that "Grace" would not be trademarkable, since it is an > English (dictionary) word. I'm really not sure about "GRACE". Good point. They'd probably have to stick an "i", "e", or "m" in front of it to do that. :-) > >I just got back from my 2 week Olympic vacation and came across this. > >(I survived the 2002 winter olympics) > > Gosh, did you actually compete in something? (Pardon my ignorance.) Heck no (unless you count driving through blizzards). I'm not exactly a 22 year-old speed demon any more. However, judging from the US curling team, I'd have quite a ways to go before I'm too old and out of shape for that sport. :-) --- T.E.D.