From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d15bdd9107cc441d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-08 13:41:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GMGPL (was Improved version (2002/1/26) of MT19937 PRNG) Date: 8 Feb 2002 13:41:57 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <4519e058.0202081341.77aa3da5@posting.google.com> References: <3C5FB2C4.5F3B9E74@greenlime.com> <3C632D2C.83BBBB1@greenlime.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.115.221.98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1013204517 21415 127.0.0.1 (8 Feb 2002 21:41:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Feb 2002 21:41:57 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19798 Date: 2002-02-08T21:41:57+00:00 List-Id: Adrian Hoe wrote in message news:<3C632D2C.83BBBB1@greenlime.com>... > To my understanding, I can copy the code into my source and mention the > origin and the authors of this copied code in my source and I will have > to also released my work under GMGPL. If you are saying that the units that will contain the copied code will be GMGPL'ed, that sounds right to me. If you are worried about it, I'd suggest contacting the authors. Its their interpretation of the GMGPL that will decide whether or not you will actually have legal hassles. -- T.E.D. Home - mailto:dennison@telepath.com (Yahoo: Ted_Dennison) Homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html To the optimist, the glass is half full. To the pessimist, the glass is half empty. To the engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.