From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cda33fc7f63c2885
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-08 19:10:29 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: list strawman
Date: 8 Jan 2002 19:10:28 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <4519e058.0201081910.51225bf@posting.google.com>
References: <mailman.1010519822.5637.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <hUI_7.9168$cD4.18615@www.newsranger.com> <uwuys1qun.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.10.28.160
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1010545829 1152 127.0.0.1 (9 Jan 2002 03:10:29
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jan 2002 03:10:29 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18675
Date: 2002-01-09T03:10:29+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov> wrote in message news:<uwuys1qun.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>...
> I vote for adding 'split'; it nicely compliments 'splice'.

OK. Next question(s): Can "split" be implemented as the inverse to
"splice", where it spilts from the iterator to the end, or does it
need to go from one iterator to another to be useful?

If the latter, should "splice" be changed to work the same way?