From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,640b65cbfbab7216 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Graham Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Untyped Ada? Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <44d88b93-6a90-4c18-8785-2164934ba700@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com> References: <47F26C46.3010607@obry.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.154.66.188 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1207322164 20073 127.0.0.1 (4 Apr 2008 15:16:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.154.66.188; posting-account=04rmagoAAABZ9PN7u3MdbKIs6DPG57E- User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.13 (Ubuntu-feisty),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20800 Date: 2008-04-04T08:16:04-07:00 List-Id: On Apr 1, 11:00 pm, "Phaedrus" wrote: > Certainly it is an important part of Ada, but I wasn't suggesting that it be > deleted entirely. However, it might be handy to have a less-strongly typed > version of Ada, for instance to create prototypes faster and easier. Then, > aspects of the prototype could be migrated into a "fully typed" arena once > the "quick and dirty" prototype was completed. > > Just thinking a little bit outside the ol' box, here... > > Brian > > I haven't been using Ada for all that long, but I have been thinking that a kinder, gentler version would be nice in some circumstances. Not necessarily *no* type-checking, but the ability to mix, say, integers, fixed-point types and floats in an equation without cluttering up the code with conversions. I dare say that you wouldn't want to program a missile in such a loose way, but for the kinds of things I'm involved in - financial apps and simulations - the level of strictness of Ada would be a turn-off for many developers. And, from what I can see, the main problem with Ada is its lack of take-up outside its core areas of avionics and real- time systems. Sorting out string handling out would be nice, too. Graham