From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 101deb,15c6ed4b761968e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,gid101deb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:09:11 -0500 Message-ID: <44B734D5.6070501@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:08:21 -0700 From: Bob Lidral User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> In-Reply-To: <20060712.7A4E6E0.D028@mojaveg.lsan.sisna.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.16.128.24 X-Trace: sv3-z5ZQlFiToC+gVLK8e4HnBAlCxxsl+mgLt7S0oKGqkWQ7j0zv42hYZnIwqgKxOqFroI2TuJ6xNhWOLX1!Zx+Dz4VgBIDW7jlfZmUaQpC+pKklUU6pn5PnBrL+B8UpMVBSFW4V0jRSJVmYwKAV X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5677 comp.lang.fortran:12038 comp.lang.pl1:2008 Date: 2006-07-13T23:08:21-07:00 List-Id: Everett M. Greene wrote: > "robin" writes: > >>glen herrmannsfeldt wrote in message ... >> >>>robin wrote: >>> >>>>glen herrmannsfeldt wrote >>> >>>>>For signed integer types, most, if not all, allow twos complement, >>>>>ones complement, or sign magnitude representation. >>> >>>>Virtually all use twos complement for negative values. >>>>Few ever used ones complement anyway. They were a PITA. >>> >>>CDC used ones complement, >> >>Yes, and they were a PITA. > > > In what regard? Ones complement vs. twos complement is > rarely of significance to a HLL programmer. > Depends of the compiler, instruction set, and application. Years ago, I did a lot of programming on CDC CYBERS. There were some operations that could result in either positive or negative zero. It was also difficult to do character comparisons. Bob Lidral lidral at alum dot mit dot edu