From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,37023471dc2e1934
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!multikabel.net!feed20.multikabel.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!lnewsinpeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewsinpeer00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.uunet.fr!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <449a87b1$0$15869$bb6a4dc3@news.uunet.fr>
From: Emmanuel Briot <briot@nospam.invalid.fr>
Subject: Re: Custom model in gtkada?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:08:41 +0200
References: <3ndpd7br1nn9$.vkcrts8e898z.dlg@40tude.net>
 <20060614210028.GA18024@ws.max.zp.ua>
 <b6ehptggg0ol$.lebhfvkvarnm.dlg@40tude.net>
 <44917d39$0$4495$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
 <xw8jxgsp30w8$.1llfb1lh4mohz$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <44941be9$0$11065$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
 <14e2r2ftir9ok.i8u1axnplx11.dlg@40tude.net>
 <449a432e$0$15869$bb6a4dc3@news.uunet.fr>
 <mgfz59ck9hje.18zecgqt5ze9w$.dlg@40tude.net>
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: lyon.act-europe.fr
X-Trace: 1150977969 news.uunet.fr 15869 212.157.227.160:23004
X-Complaints-To: abuse@fr.uu.net
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4901
Date: 2006-06-22T14:08:41+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Another point, a list of pointers to subprograms is in no way better than
> a list of tagged objects (with primitive subprograms).

I personnaly disagree, and since you don't provide technical, precise input,
I won't change my opinion.

Since Java's old AWT interface was using primitive subprograms, and was
replaced by SWING which uses signals, I would guess most people do believe
that signals are more flexible