From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7684e927a2475d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!news.tiscali.de!newsfeed.hanau.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!newsfeed.ision.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!ision!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:32:38 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus Organization: elsewhere User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060530) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: can one build commercial applications with latest gnat and other licenses related questions... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <449660f0$0$11077$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jun 2006 10:31:44 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: fe68b683.newsread4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=a2de`=P0F60 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4821 Date: 2006-06-19T10:31:44+02:00 List-Id: klobert wrote: > I am looking for some clear information related with ada compiler > licensing. > Is it possible to build commercial applications without releasing the > source code using latest "libre" version of gnat ? Yes. If by commercial you mean selling just the binaries to third parties, no. > Or is it necessary to buy a $15K commercial license from adacore in > order to build commercial applications ? No. You have a number of compiler vendors offering tools. However, if you want to use GNAT, and sell just binaries to third parties, then likely yes. > What's the difference in license between gcc ada and gnat ? Many differences. FSF GNAT is based on a more recent GCC. Chances are that AdaCore's GCC is based on GCC 3.4.6 in many cases, and more intensely maintained. > What's the difference in functionality between these: > (gnat, gccada3.44, gccada4.1.0 ? ) Bug fixes, ASIS (yes, no, some), varying levels of support for the new Ada 2005 features, and more. > What happened to the Eclat compiler ? Don't know. > Is thee any ada compiler under BSD license ? Not aware of one. HTH, Georg