From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.germany.com!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:03:21 +0100
From: JA <spamtrap@3feet.co.uk>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
References: <mubcg.13522$fb2.853@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>
 <epcs4e.qb8.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <tHkcg.6937$kR6.484@trnddc05>
 <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <PkHcg.90575$Fs1.7198@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <To_cg.10095$S7.4017@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
 <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
 <S8gdg.9145$ix2.6702@trnddc03>
In-Reply-To: <S8gdg.9145$ix2.6702@trnddc03>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <44775f08$0$2663$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net>
Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 007535d4.ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=U\CL@_]Ik79d]2CmVTf441igd3Y`7Rb;>YZmCHj47lf5^oZ[2EjkST5_oc8h53JG_>3<lMaaZDFI6FISf?d5:gG<
X-Complaints-To: abuse@plus.net
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4514 comp.lang.fortran:10313
Date: 2006-05-26T21:03:21+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dan Nagle wrote:
  an example of a Fortran compiler
> available today for Windows, MacOSX or Linux that does _not_
> provide a bounds checking option?

Most current Fortran compilers cannot detect array bounds errors on 
assumed size arrays.  I doubt that would be true if bounds checking were 
"part of the language".
-- 
John Appleyard