From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa4492559026112a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT on Debian or Gentoo?
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:46:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4422B4CB.5040408@mailinator.com>
References: <1142950303.745049.94380@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
    <dvq315$4nk$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
    <1142996939.825705.312690@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
 <dvu9ld$9j5$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net TicZbQkO5iM4YCHVRdui1QPVazUfMUc/Pe325Py3IYbg7q95o=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <dvu9ld$9j5$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3575
Date: 2006-03-23T15:46:35+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bobby D. Bryant wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, "Adrian Hoe" <abyhoe@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>How about gcc/gnat 4.x?
> 
> 
> Should be a simple matter of hacking an ebuild.
> 
> Is there any reason I would want to do that?  What's new between 3.4.x
> and 4.x?

Most evident changes would be in Ada05 support, which is being added. 
I'm aware of several bugfixes in that regard and I've already seen a new 
error message (for something that previously went undetected).