From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9888736260ba087,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.volia.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: GNAT profiling
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 09:23:04 +0100
Message-ID: <440559E8.7070209@mailinator.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net TnnhyLh0W9h38aF1Qi735wbR9EsZ3qhvZ5bh9W56sJ3u+r9Us=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3219
Date: 2006-03-01T09:23:04+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ok, after revising some old threads, I see there was a consensus in that 
(at least linux) gprof doesn't work with multitasking programs, and 
there were reports that it neither does with single-task programs.

I'm thus musing what could be a (preferible free) option for code 
profiling. I've successfully used valgrind for memory profiling, but for 
now I'm DoD with this other aspect.

Any suggestions welcome!