From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a687662f09731bb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.kjsl.com!news-peer-lilac.gradwell.net!not-for-mail
From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@baesystems.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <dld0t5$df3$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
 <ZqCdnSOLI6WepefeRVn-uw@comcast.com>
 <slrndnlfs8.1pa.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org> <m2acg5i1ko.fsf@grendel.local>
 <dlelkn$g6l$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
 <slrndnoa1k.22e.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org>
 <1132227919.9036.51.camel@sonnenregen> <u3blv30wu.fsf@acm.org>
 <1132233886.11218.11.camel@sonnenregen> <ulkzmsw5v.fsf@acm.org>
 <slrndnv9qv.1r7.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org>
 <Ij4Bf.1960$2O6.514@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>
 <SUaBf.2447$Dk.828@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net> <ud5iimkc8.fsf@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Don't use the "use" clause
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:42:56 -0000
Organization: BAE SYSTEMS
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506
Message-ID: <43d5f493$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: glkas0286.greenlnk.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.1
X-Trace: 1138095868 news.gradwell.net 87298 dnews/20.133.0.1:37955
X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2601
Date: 2006-01-24T09:42:56+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Stephen Leake wrote:
>> Right. The OP might want to use SPARK, which does not have use
>> clauses.
>
> That seems odd. What does SPARK gain by outlawing use clauses? Surely
> the examiner can handle the extra name resolution!

But the human reader can't handle the extra name resolution! :-)

Cheers

-- Martin