From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,80bc3e0698be468f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Type safety on wikipedia Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:13:37 +0100 Message-ID: <43DA0061.1050501@mailinator.com> References: <1138260496.230283.147640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1138283608.433842.76060@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <43D8E85C.6020805@mailinator.com> <1535741.yb0A0MsH1D@linux1.krischik.com> <43D912A3.2030201@mailinator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 30xGbGhy8e9n7p/xN0qeuAORoAlxSnDEodcR1tJ44DcNMFihQ= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2672 Date: 2006-01-27T12:13:37+01:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote: > "Alex R. Mosteo" writes: > > >>This is something I've mused about sometimes: Let's suppose some Ada >>compiler goes ahead and provides a GC. What happens with programs >>written without taking this into account? > > > 13.11.2(17) only says that Free _should_ reclaim the storage. I > suppose for a GC implementation there could be at least 2 > implementation strategies: > > * don't actually reclaim, just remove local reference and deal with > tasks if necessary > > * check that the reference count is in fact 1 and raise *_Error if > not! That would be useful! Neat! I hadn't figured that path of action. Indeed it seems a very good strategy. I can imagine unknown bugs popping out after years of silently wait and rare crashes... hehe...