From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,80bc3e0698be468f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Type safety on wikipedia Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:58:22 +0100 Message-ID: <43D8B95E.80001@mailinator.com> References: <1138260496.230283.147640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net RxM1G9s/h1X2+qi3FQTyQQR1SldsCPO+X7lrgpvXV4IgMtFkg= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <1138260496.230283.147640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2645 Date: 2006-01-26T12:58:22+01:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik wrote: > Hello > > I found this interesting article on Wikipedia which made me think a > bit: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_safety > > Do have a look at the talk page as well. After reading that I'm not sure how Ada can be type safe if unchecked deallocation is a common way of implementing relatively common tasks as linked lists and so. The explicit example given for "type unsafety" is easily doable in Ada. But I acknowledge that I'm new to the topic, anyone can explain?