From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6cbbf1799c1dc6da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 2005 box (<>) rules in default values Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:19:44 +0100 Message-ID: <43CF59B0.7020609@mailinator.com> References: <43CCAB76.6050907@mailinator.com> <43CE20CF.4080801@mailinator.com> <43CE65E8.1040307@mailinator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 8JU76IO3Q8SBdHkcgybf/wdq0iQifhtQhTSoUKHZgleQocMk0= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2528 Date: 2006-01-19T10:19:44+01:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt wrote: > So I conclude the compiler is wrong; I'd suggest sending a bug report. Thanks Randy, I feel relieved. I'll file the bug tomorrow if nobody else has anything to say that contradicts this conclusion, and also thanks to the other people who has been following the thread.