From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a7ce27b599c77060 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!fdn.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail Message-ID: <43BD4ABC.4020905@obry.net> Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 17:35:08 +0100 From: Pascal Obry Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada To: Martin Dowie Subject: Re: Elaboration problem with a task References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: 05 Jan 2006 17:35:15 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.120.146.231 X-Trace: 1136478915 news.wanadoo.fr 20187 82.120.146.231:3899 X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2450 Date: 2006-01-05T17:35:15+01:00 List-Id: Martin, > No probs - the default GNAT behaviour is to use it's own rules about > elaboration, not the Ada rules. They are supposed to be 'better' than > the Ada rules but if you want Ada rather than GNAT, you always have to > use "-gnatE", rather like using "-gnato". You can put it this way or... GNAT by default does a static analysis of the elaboration and generates elaboration that does work in 99% of the cases. If this default behavior is not working in your case then -gnatE which does a dynamic elaboration checking. Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595