From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f384032a8c47ef0d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!infeed-2.proxad.net!news9-e.free.fr!not-for-mail Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:41:45 +0100 From: Lionel Draghi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Debian/1.7.8-1 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: about OpenToken References: <439b6ac7$0$20862$636a55ce@news.free.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <439c7405$0$28020$626a14ce@news.free.fr> Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Dec 2005 19:46:30 MET NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.236.216.140 X-Trace: 1134326790 news9-e.free.fr 28020 82.236.216.140:55818 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6834 Date: 2005-12-11T19:46:30+01:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake a �crit : > I'm using a version of OpenToken that I have patched and enhanced. I'm > no longer sure what version I got originally, but since the OpenToken > website is dated 9/6/00, it's quite probable I started with 3.0b. > > Perhaps if there is enough interest, we should start a SourceForge project. That's a good idea, at least to start from your up-to-date sources. For the future, it may be interesting to compare OpenToken with similar library like ANTLR (http://www.antlr.org/). Is OpenToken a good basis, and is it worth the time, or is it better to interface with another existing library? -- Lionel Draghi