From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!software.org!nettles From: nettles@software.org (David Nettles) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Rational ADA development environment Message-ID: <438@software.software.org> Date: 12 Feb 90 13:08:45 GMT References: <405@wmt.UUCP> <595@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <4722@rtech.rtech.com> Sender: news@software.org Reply-To: nettles@software.org (David Nettles) Organization: Software Productivity Consortium, Herndon, Virginia List-Id: In article <4722@rtech.rtech.com> dennism@menace.UUCP (Dennis Moore) writes: >ssawyers@cadfx.ccad.uiowa.edu (Steve Sawyers,212 ERF,,) writes: > >Isn't this typical for a government project?!? 40,000 LOC and 2,500 pages >of documentation? Are you serious? 40,000 lines of code is 667 pages (at >60 lines per page). That's almost 4 pages of documentation per line of >code, even if your LOC counter doesn't count blank lines or comments as lines. > >If ADA is such a wonderful, self-documenting, easy to code, easy to understand, >easy to maintain language (as the government claims it is), then why are 2,500 >pages of documentation necessary? > >-- Dennis Moore, my own opinions, blahblahblah Nice cheap shot. Though not familiar with the particular project, I have worked both sides of a DoD project (military and civilian contractor). Let me list some of the attending documents that are required as deliverables, regardless of language used. System Specification System Design Document Software Requirements Specification Software Development Plan Interface Requirements Specification Software Test Plan Interface Design Document Software Design Document Software Test Descriptions Software Test Reports Operation and Support Documents Version Description Document The government is going to get their pound of documentation regardless of how wonderful the language is. -- David Nettles