From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5bc4be576204aa20 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!molokai.public-internet.co.uk!newspeer.public-internet.co.uk!caladan!bbc!news-peer-lilac.gradwell.net!not-for-mail From: "Martin Dowie" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1c4ef.1412$s14.1390@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Buffer overflow Article - CACM Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:14:57 -0000 Organization: BAE SYSTEMS X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Message-ID: <4379a518$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net> X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: glkas0286.greenlnk.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Nov 2005 09:16:16 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.1 X-Trace: 1132046176 news.gradwell.net 38039 dnews/20.133.0.1 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6392 Date: 2005-11-15T09:16:16+00:00 List-Id: Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > Martin Dowie wrote: >> >> That's probably true now but there are loads of examples where >> running _Ada83_ on 68020/68040 with checks-on was too slow. > > No doubt. However, I've been using Ada since 1984 and have never > encountered a case where the checks made the difference between > success and failure in meeting timing requirements. Wish I could say the same! :-(