From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.224.69.6 with SMTP id x6mr365827qai.0.1375078695491; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:18:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.128.97 with SMTP id nn1mr137030qeb.13.1375078695479; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.bbs-scene.org!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cb17no944128qab.0!news-out.google.com!ce7ni0qab.0!nntp.google.com!cb17no1022052qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:18:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <145t0st2ukuvp.q74tk0wrblld$.dlg@40tude.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=136.163.203.9; posting-account=l8k8IwoAAADeDydswOzwNzmn10qOk9gt NNTP-Posting-Host: 136.163.203.9 References: <87mwplvthn.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <9a48d84b-4160-4824-a658-48dfcf12d0d6@googlegroups.com> <862c7bde-dfbe-44a4-8180-017c4e73f585@googlegroups.com> <145t0st2ukuvp.q74tk0wrblld$.dlg@40tude.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <436a874f-9e37-46c4-b729-447c06081155@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Accessibility checks From: ake.ragnar.dahlgren@gmail.com Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 06:18:15 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16596 Date: 2013-07-28T23:18:15-07:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:27:45 PM UTC+2, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 06:01:21 -0700 (PDT), ake.ragnar.dahlgren@gmail.com w= rote: > I do not use anonymous access types either. Note that there exist q= uite important cases where anonymous access types are necessary and unavoid= able: 1. Primitive operations. Named access types arguments cannot be dispa= tching; 2. Rosen's trick. Maybe it works with named types in Ada 2012. I di= dn't check it; 3. Discriminants; 4. Returning managed objects by reference.= P.S. Arguably these issues could be resolved without anonymous access type= s and possibly without access types. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://w= ww.dmitry-kazakov.de Thank you Dmitry for your feedback. Best regards, =C5ke Ragnar Dahlgren