From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9a5f3bd162009c01
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!koehntopp.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:15:38 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050817)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2005: Too clever by half?
References: <70e0e$4331acfc$4995583$14979@ALLTEL.NET>
   <87hdcew7wq.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
   <1127511077.919641.107390@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <sa4vf0rnfjj.fsf@snoopy.microcomaustralia.com.au>
   <tIcZe.3304$vw6.3158@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
   <87hdcasf3o.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
   <20eZe.3450$QE1.1476@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>
   <4335763b$0$16490$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
 <1127601625.923307.266150@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1127601625.923307.266150@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4336bec3$0$26212$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Sep 2005 17:14:11 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8e5552b9.newsread2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=lj8Q\`J]NRfa1IKbSTkC[iQ5U85hF6f;djW\KbG]kaMhGSi?jHD8GO`6<YMm:2an_chP3YJKgE\jljMXKnFInjeh
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5140
Date: 2005-09-25T17:14:11+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Chad R. Meiners wrote:
> From: Georg Bauhaus
> 
> <quote>
> Chad Meiners has told us an example. He dislikes RMS,
> and this reflects in part on the GPL.
> <\quote>
> 
> I don't dislike RMS!

OK, sorry. I was driven to this quick conclusion from your statement that RMS
must be nuts, and that you seem to disagree with some of his ideas.