From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e26dfa741e64e5f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:39:35 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Organization: future apps GmbH
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050831 Debian/1.7.8-1sarge2
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2005 Edition is now available
References: <1126875543.239666.325290@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <bFCWe.24901$QB2.5887@reader1.news.jippii.net>
   <3467d$432b0af1$49956f8$22115@ALLTEL.NET>
 <1127092850.124710.16350@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1127092850.124710.16350@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <432ea352$0$27561$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Sep 2005 13:38:58 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: af2a3071.newsread4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=SL`][_LD9O\\ODPOkW97AZ:ejgIfPPldTjW\KbG]kaMXFYk:AnJB[C]5QcE1AObAS\UUng9_FXZ=S>:=P9Ihe`BX@Z?dZ]MOidU
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4897
Date: 2005-09-19T13:38:58+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

chrismiller677@hotmail.com wrote:

> That said, the situation whereby that if you compile your code with a
> FSF compiler that you must inturn release the code under their licence
> is absurd. But it is up to the FSF to fix it, not AdaCore.

In the case of FSF GNAT, there is nothing to fix because compiler
and run-time do not require releases under whatever license.
I think this is true for the other compilers in FSF GCC, too.