From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e26dfa741e64e5f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!134.158.69.22.MISMATCH!in2p3.fr!not-for-mail
From: xavier <xavier@ipnnarval.in2p3.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2005 Edition is now available
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:36:20 +0200
Organization: In2p3
Message-ID: <432ABC44.5070508@ipnnarval.in2p3.fr>
References: <432919be$0$10539$4d4eb98e@read.news.fr.uu.net>
   <m24q8mwzrf.fsf@hugin.crs4.it>
   <1126773856.876636.265130@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <1126794444.071827.191320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: grave@ipno.in2p3.fr
NNTP-Posting-Host: ipnnarval.in2p3.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ccpntc8.in2p3.fr 1126874220 7063 134.158.92.7 (16 Sep 2005 12:37:00
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@cc.in2p3.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:37:00 +0000 (UTC)
To: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802)
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
In-Reply-To: <1126794444.071827.191320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4789
Date: 2005-09-16T14:36:20+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> PS. If you voice your opinion, I'd like to hear about your current
> distribution and version of GNAT.  I'd also like to hear your reasons
> for using, or not using, Debian.  Just curious.
> 


Hi,

I'm currently using debian with 3.15p-13 for ppc release with some patch 
to have a fully asis + xmlada + aws + glade for power pc architecture
and 3.15p-12 for x86 architecture.

I have recompiled glade (cvs tree) with gnat 4.1 recently without 
problem on x86 architecture but I have probleme with aws reconstruction 
(sources from debian repository).

I was away of compiler consideration for a while and I have problem to 
understand fully the discution actually undergowing, but you can 
consider I vote for a compiler that permit to a full coherent package 
list libaws,xmlada,glade and so on... If for licensing reason the future 
gnat compiler choosen doesn't have all this software available, I'll try 
to help to compile the missing packages both for ppc/x86 architecture.

xavier