From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,92b68ea97a40409a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:59:10 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus Organization: future apps GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Debian/1.7.8-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: interface type question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <42f92725$0$6966$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Aug 2005 23:59:01 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 4e208f6f.newsread2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=MW?i^IK hi, clause 3.9.4 about Interface Types in Amendment-D12.html has an example where a Queue interfaces is parenting a Synchronized_Queue interface. An explaining paragraph follows and says, "The Synchronized_Queue interface ... adds two additional dispatching operations." But does it add any dispatching operation to Synchronized_Queue? "type Queue is limited interface; procedure Append(Q : in out Queue; Element : in Person_Name) is abstract; ... "type Synchronized_Queue is synchronized interface and Queue; -- see 9.11 procedure Append_Wait(Q : in out Queue; Element : in Person_Name) is abstract; ..." By habit I had assumed that the first parameter of Append_Wait should be Synchronized_Queue, not Queue. Is this Correct? http://www.ada-auth.org/ai-files/grab_bag/Amendment-D12.html (big) -- Georg