From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ADDR_WS
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9bbfb8cd49f1a51
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:41:43 +0200
From: Erlo Haugen <"elh whirlpool terma spot com">
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Isn't this in favour of Ada??
References: <42d64dde$0$64794$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>
 <dbo7se$ab0$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
 <42e0a2a6$0$36943$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>
 <dbqe9b$a9n$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
In-Reply-To: <dbqe9b$a9n$1@sunnews.cern.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <42e0cd67$0$37532$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>
Organization: TDC Totalloesninger
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.163.1.105
X-Trace: 1122028903 dread12.news.tele.dk 37532 193.163.1.105:20239
X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3727
Date: 2005-07-22T12:41:43+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Maciej Sobczak wrote:
> Erlo Haugen wrote:
> 
>> What i meant to say was that Ada already has the features
> 
> 
> Yes, I understand this. But standardizing threading features in other 
> languages means simply that Ada can lose its competetive edge in this 
> very aspect (portability of concurrent programs). That's why I don't 
> really think that the article in question is "in favour" of Ada.
> 
> 
Oh, I see. That might be correct, but for now it seems that Ada is 
leading the pack.

-- 
Erlo
-----

The statements and opinions are mine and does not
neccesarily reflect those of my employers