From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f2690a5e963b61b6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:02:37 +0200
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Organization: future apps GmbH
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Debian/1.7.8-1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 Ada.Containers Cursor danger.
References: <42cb8d21$0$22761$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
   <ldco4pwrxop4$.1py0a7isiagea.dlg@40tude.net>
   <z--dnRI60_7j_lHfRVn-qw@megapath.net>
   <tyi72ga8ch55$.3tea03tbwrtx.dlg@40tude.net>
   <42cd064c$0$10817$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
   <k62rlp2n1ls3.1cnwufmnuit7v.dlg@40tude.net>
   <42cda8c4$0$22780$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
   <1u3hh2597i4ne$.1ryetugksbmus.dlg@40tude.net>
   <uslyp8mmb.fsf@earthlink.net>
   <1121093807.949660.274060@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1121124248.600055.292320@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <1121137531.752285.44280@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <946e7$42d3c64d$4995421$28449@ALLTEL.NET>
   <1121179909.262566.192270@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
   <1121182524.007719.77090@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <1121193651.532277.179550@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1121195560.962713.217640@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
 <1121197323.001169.250300@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1121197323.001169.250300@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <42d421d4$0$18018$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Jul 2005 22:02:28 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: d808ed62.newsread4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=ZRS^9l\UV5>j12nnM8XB1>:ejgIfPPld4jW\KbG]kaM8AV6U:Z=fE=?SW5?NSKc^Y?UUng9_FXZ=3>:=P9Ihe`B8@Z?dZ]MOid5
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12024
Date: 2005-07-12T22:02:28+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

MMM wrote:

>>>Comparing sorted vs. hashed is like apples vs. oranges.
>>
>>A general-purpose container library needs both.  That's why hashed
>>containers are being added to the C++ standard library.
> 
> It looks like you are not reading the message you are replying to.
> 

>From the link you have given I can see that there are zillions
of meanings of "order". AI 302 adds clarity by selecting no more than
two I think. A meaning in the very first sentences:

 "The library
comprises sequence containers (vectors and lists), for inserting elements at
specified positions, and associative containers (sets and maps), which position
elements in order by key."

That is, positioning (a necessary implementation mechanism) is by key.
Later, the text introduces a sort order, and ordered associative
containers. So perhaps "order" is overloaded in the AI to mean
sorting and positioning depending on contenxt?