From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f2690a5e963b61b6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:12:33 +0200 From: Georg Bauhaus User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 Ada.Containers Cursor danger. References: <1120474891.635131.216700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1120575076.876798.108220@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1120583470.429264.325450@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1120639461.224146.235430@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1120642489.101644.74190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <1120643138.031761.212450@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <42cbb52c$0$10807$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <1120666922.733581.179180@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <42cc1f0f$0$10808$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <1120739383.801736.224270@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <42cd343b$0$22784$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1120759007.967336.187840@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <1120759007.967336.187840@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <42cda8db$0$22780$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> Organization: Arcor NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Jul 2005 00:12:43 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 5d3a38c1.newsread2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=;H\:a87G2hhP3YJKgE\jlXEQl`[1E3Ig X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11953 Date: 2005-07-08T00:12:43+02:00 List-Id: Dmitriy Anisimkov wrote: > << > >>generic >> procedure Process (Key : Key_Type; Value : Value_Type; Stop : out > > > If you are worried about Ada 2006's Iterate using Cursors internally > Because they get it in "in" parameter from library, they do not have > any reason to change it. Well I suspect in the same situation they won't have reason to change a Cursor they get? Anyway, I don't see that further speculations will will get us anywhere without substantial data. Else nothing demonstrates that Adaified STL style algorithms must be a desaster.