From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:590e:: with SMTP id
 n14-v6mr4713692iob.70.1535631298497;
        Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:af15:: with SMTP id y21-v6mr48903oie.6.1535631298268;
 Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder4.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!85.12.16.70.MISMATCH!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!w19-v6no568723itb.0!news-out.google.com!c63-v6ni760ith.0!nntp.google.com!g24-v6no573537iti.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <69e04c61-8ea3-40e2-bb9d-e5a128247df3@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2003:c7:83e3:1a94:7053:6d9e:7712:5940;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83e3:1a94:7053:6d9e:7712:5940
References: <eec01618-ee08-4f7e-be3d-cb16ef2beb4b@googlegroups.com>
 <pm4p3l$afb$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <69e04c61-8ea3-40e2-bb9d-e5a128247df3@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <42cc6f60-202f-4274-9804-b571a05ceea1@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Where to find Ravenscar compatible ADT Containers (List, Vector,
 stack)
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 12:14:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2234
X-Received-Body-CRC: 866722977
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:54298
Date: 2018-08-30T05:14:57-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Donnerstag, 30. August 2018 02:21:54 UTC+2 schrieb Jere:
> I have a question about this as it has always bothered me.  The
> section that specifies that is under Implementation Advice, which
> doesn't sound binding.  That sounds more like it is a suggestion
> to the vendor rather than a requirement.  Is Implementation
> Advice such that a conforming Ada compiler must follow it
> (so not really advice at that point)?  I've intentionally avoided
> bounded containers in situations where I want portability for
> some of my embedded targets that don't use heap because it 
> doesn't sound guaranteed that it will not use heap, even
> if my current compiler implements it that way now.

See AARM 1.1.2 for the structure of the RM, especially (37,37.a-d) for Implementation Advice.