From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9bbfb8cd49f1a51 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsread.com!newsprint.newsread.com!newsfeed.stueberl.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Isn't this in favour of Ada?? Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:28:57 +0200 Message-ID: <42E102A9.5060707@mailinator.com> References: <42d64dde$0$64794$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk> <42e0a2a6$0$36943$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk> <42e0cd67$0$37532$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net rhfG6oO3LXnUhNab39ejpg1HmZ74QaTs6vDKo6U4ZUS4httoA= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <42e0cd67$0$37532$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk> Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3731 Date: 2005-07-22T16:28:57+02:00 List-Id: Erlo Haugen wrote: > Maciej Sobczak wrote: > >> Erlo Haugen wrote: >> >>> What i meant to say was that Ada already has the features >> >> >> >> Yes, I understand this. But standardizing threading features in other >> languages means simply that Ada can lose its competetive edge in this >> very aspect (portability of concurrent programs). That's why I don't >> really think that the article in question is "in favour" of Ada. >> >> > Oh, I see. That might be correct, but for now it seems that Ada is > leading the pack. OpenMP is pushing hard. At least I heard of it a lot, and seems to be pretty standard when it comes to multithreading with C/C++. This edge in Ada may be very well already lost.