From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef4913dd6741a38
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: small plug for #ada iirc channel
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:15:35 +0200
Message-ID: <42B6C177.8040609@mailinator.com>
References: <bllse.12013$q46.11010@newsfe1-win.ntli.net>
 <mailman.61.1119073467.17633.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net PMTO3NfTB/I57waj94vBMwVDU9aiYGRE4QEh8aZBc9htuCtT8=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <mailman.61.1119073467.17633.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11499
Date: 2005-06-20T15:15:35+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Rod Kay wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>     I found the #ada channel lately and am a little surprised how little the 
> Ada community make use of what I have found to be an invaluable resource.

In which network is it located?

> 
>     I'm beginning to suspect that the channel op is in fact an Ada 'bot' ... 
> able to point you towards an Ada solution for most problems, and quoting the 
> LRM chapter & verse.
> 
>     If the channel op is not available (infrequent) there is generally someone 
> else about to help ...
> 
>     So, in short, if you have an Ada prob and need a quick answer, try #ada. 
> Students, hobbyists and those new to Ada, in particular, may find the channel 
> helpful.
> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> Rod.
> 
> 
> ps: Of course, it may well be that Ada is so simple and elegant, that help is 
> little needed ... ;).