From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,14be6619f79b4573 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!212.101.4.254.MISMATCH!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Hashing on System.Address Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:52:38 +0200 Message-ID: <42AE9AD6.80803@mailinator.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net O4nQoRmeNZIvawv1aisVHQX5ekZEEyKvJGaolqoUvprZ3FccQ= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11340 Date: 2005-06-14T10:52:38+02:00 List-Id: Duncan Sands wrote: > By the way, is there any reason why Ada.Containers doesn't provide some > standard hash functions? I reckon hashing on strings and on addresses > would be pretty handy. Out of Containers hierarchy: Ada.Strings.Hash