From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e718c96a7961738,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Alfred Hilscher <SPAM@alfred-hilscher.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Profiling GNAT programs with gprof
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:12:53 +0200
Organization: none
Message-ID: <42A5C785.CB651501@alfred-hilscher.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1118161069 04 8771 dNX3rJ06pKwqwrt 050607 16:17:49
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: GFzOC8Zp8eouXfgEG7o1HPdpe1cJKt46L3d1YjTAIku53W3XltFtgm
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11250
Date: 2005-06-07T18:12:53+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Has someone experience with gprof and GNAT? It seem to work when I
profile sequential programs, but if I have tasks in my code then the
result of gprof seem invalid. E.g. a procedure called only three times
at all is listed as about 10000 calls. And while the over all runtime of
the prog is about 2 sec, gprof shows the consumed time for this
procedure with a few thousands seconds. 
It looks like as if the statistik counters were not initialized. What
have I to do, to get correct results?
I use GNAT 3.15p and Windows 2000.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
To send me mail, please replace "Spam" by "Jedermann"
-----------------------------------------------------